Previous PageTable Of Contents

Figures and Tables


Figure 1. Joist configuration.


Figure 2. Joist prestressing tendon profile.


Figure 3. HJ-3 and HJ-4 web reinforcement.


Figure 4. FRP joist repair.


Figure 5. High-performance concrete strength versus time.


Figure 6. Prestressing tendon stress versus strain.


Figure 7. Prestressing and casting of hybrid joists.


Figure 8. Completed hybrid joist construction.


Figure 9. FRP application.


Figure 10. Gap in FRP upgrade of HJ-3.


Figure 11. Epoxy injection of voids.


Figure 12. Internal strain gage layout for HJ-3, HJ-4, HJ-6, and HJ-7.


Figure 13. External strain gage layout on HJ-3.


Figure 14. External strain gage layout on HJ-4.


Figure 15. LVDT locations on test specimens.


Figure 16. Potentiometer locations on test specimens.


Figure 17. Block diagram of data recording system.


Figure 18. Test setup.


Figure 19. Load versus deflection for HJ-3, HJ-4, HJ-6, and HJ-7.


Figure 20. Load versus deflection cycles for HJ-4.


Figure 21. Deflected shape for HJ-3.


Figure 22. Deflected shape for HJ-4 before repair (top) and after FRP repair (bottom).


Figure 23. Deflected shape of HJ-6.


Figure 24. Deflected shape for HJ-7.


Figure 25. Strain distribution for HJ-3.


Figure 26. Strain distribution for HJ-4.


Figure 27. Strain distribution for HJ-6.


Figure 28. Strain distribution for HJ-7.


Figure 29. Strain distribution along strand length of HJ-3.


Figure 30. Strain distribution along strand length of HJ-4.


Figure 31. Strain distribution along strand length of HJ-6.


Figure 32. Strain distribution along strand length of HJ-7.


Figure 33. HJ-3 upgrade FRP strains.


Figure 34. HJ-4 repair FRP strains.


Figure 35. Crack patterns for HJ-6.


Figure 36. Failure of HJ-6.


Figure 37. Crack patterns for HJ-7.

Figure 38. Crack patterns for HJ-3.


Figure 39. Failure of HJ-3.


Figure 40. Crack Patterns of HJ-4 prior to FRP repair.


Figure 41. Crack patterns for HJ-4.


Figure 42. Shear repair design procedure.


Figure 43. Simply supported beam.


Figure 44. Shear diagram.


Figure 45. FRP wrap repair.

Table 1. Hybrid Joists Tested

Table 2. Epoxy Material Properties

Table 3. Yarn Properties

* Seguin Test Method - Hexel Manufacturing facility standard methods based on appropriate Standardized testing procedure

Table 4. Fabric Properties

Table 5. Composite Laminate Specification

* Tensile retained 7 days @ 100% RH, 1,000 hours ozone, 1,000 hours alkali, 1,000 hours salt water, and 1,000 hours at 140OF
Cured for 48 hours at 140oF Using Hexcel Sample Preparation

Table 6. Composite Material Properties

Table 7. Casting and Release Dates for Each Hybrid Joist Web

Table 8. Instrumentation for HJ-3 Upgraded With FRP

Table 9. Instrumentation for HJ-4 Without FRP Repair

Table 10. Instrumentation for HJ-4 With FRP Repair

Table 11. Principal Experimental Test Results for Hybrid Joists

* Sum of two actuators.
**No failure occurred.

Table 12. Camber and Deflection for Hybrid Joists (in.)

* Deflection at end of test; no failure occurred.

CERL DISTRIBUTION

Previous PageTable Of Contents